Why Some People Choose Not to Use Insurance for Therapy

People rarely think about therapy costs during calm or easy times. Most begin considering therapy when life already feels overwhelming.

Questions about insurance usually arise at a critical moment. People realize they need support but feel unsure about the details or logistics. This timing shapes how they decide on therapy.

Even with insurance, exploring therapy options can feel confusing.

Many believe using insurance for therapy is always the responsible or practical choice. If insurance feels limiting or uncomfortable, people often blame themselves rather than question the system.

This guide does not discourage anyone from using insurance. Instead, it explains why some people intentionally choose therapy without insurance, even when they have coverage. That decision can be thoughtful and clear, not avoidant.

Why Insurance Decisions are Hard to Make

People who ask about using insurance for therapy are often engaged and well-informed.

These individuals tend to be thoughtful, responsible, and strategic. Many maximize benefits, weigh tradeoffs, and manage complexity well. Yet, the decision about insurance for therapy can feel especially burdensome.

People rarely make therapy decisions during neutral times. Most decide during periods of stress, burnout, transition, or emotional overload, when mental bandwidth is already limited.

Confusing insurance language adds another layer of complexity and may stall decision-making.

You have not done anything wrong. The insurance system does not provide ease or clarity during vulnerable moments.

At this point, many people stop asking, "What am I doing wrong?" and start asking, "Why does the system make accessing care so difficult?"

What Using Insurance for Therapy Actually Involves

Using insurance for therapy is not simply a financial transaction. It is a medical process with specific requirements.

In most cases, insurance-based therapy involves:

• A diagnosable mental health condition

• Documentation in a medical record

• Treatment that aligns with plan rules and limitations

• Possible session caps, reviews, or authorization requirements

• 
  

For many people, this structure works well and provides meaningful access to care.

For others, these requirements introduce concerns that are not purely financial.

By recognizing these realities and the requirements involved, you can better evaluate your options. Understanding these realities allows you to make an informed choice rather than an assumed one.

Why Many Therapists Choose Not to Accept Insurance

A question that often follows is one that people do not always say out loud.

Why is it that the therapists I like do not take insurance?

In most cases, this decision is not about exclusivity or profit. It is about clinical structure and ethical care. Insurance plans often limit the number of sessions or types of treatment they consider medically necessary. No standardized number of sessions determines when someone heals, and many therapists view these limits as incompatible with individualized responsive care.

Accepting insurance can also require extensive administrative work, including ongoing documentation, treatment reviews, and compliance with shifting plan requirements. Many therapists choose not to pass that burden on to clients or allow it to shape the pace and depth of therapy.

Most therapists who do not accept insurance still provide superbills so clients can seek reimbursement if their plan allows. Clients usually submit the superbill to their insurance provider, either through the online portal or by mail, to claim reimbursement.

To begin, clients usually need to obtain a superbill from their therapist, which contains details such as the therapist's credentials, diagnosis codes, session dates, and fees. They should then check with their insurance provider to understand the specific requirements or forms needed for submission.

Although reimbursement rates vary widely by plan and therapists typically do not calculate or verify these amounts on a client’s behalf, having all necessary details ready can make the process smoother.

This choice is often about preserving clinical autonomy, protecting therapeutic quality, and maintaining a structure that supports ethical, client-centered care.

Privacy, Medical Records, and Long-Term Considerations

One of the most common reasons people choose not to use insurance for therapy is privacy.

Individuals in leadership roles, community-facing positions, or close-knit professional environments often experience this concern more strongly.

Common considerations include:

• Comfort with a formal diagnosis in a permanent medical record

• People worry that others might share or access their information over time.

• Desire for discretion, anonymity, or contained support

• Preference for minimizing administrative visibility

These concerns are not about secrecy. They are about autonomy.

Unlike insurance-based therapy, which requires sharing personal information with insurance companies and recording it in medical records, private-pay therapy grants clients greater control over their confidential information. Session details remain within the therapy room unless the client opts to disclose them. For those prioritizing confidentiality and autonomy, this increased control can provide reassurance that their therapeutic experience remains private.

Flexibility, Pacing, and Therapeutic Fit

Another reason some people choose therapy without insurance is the flexibility it offers.

Insurance-based care can shape:

• Session length and frequency

• Duration of treatment

• Types of therapeutic approaches used

• 
  

Out-of-network or private-pay therapy often allows for more control over pacing and structure. People who want to move intentionally rather than quickly, or who seek a specific therapeutic style or specialization, may find greater value in having this flexibility.

For many, the decision is not about rejecting insurance. It is about choosing a care format that feels sustainable and responsive.

Why Cost Is Only Part of the Decision

Cost matters. Avoiding that reality does not serve anyone.

At the same time, cost is rarely the only factor people consider. Sustainability, fit, emotional safety, and privacy often carry equal weight.

Access challenges are also structural. A significant number of adults with mental health needs receive no treatment at all due to limited insurance coverage, provider shortages, long waitlists, and gaps between medical and behavioral health systems.

According to the National Council for Mental Wellbeing and Mental Health America, more than half of adults in the United States with a mental health condition receive no treatment.

When care feels difficult to access, it is not a personal failure. It is a systems issue.

Some individuals use insurance at specific points in their lives and choose private pay at others. Some combine approaches over time. Some decide that fewer, more intentional sessions feel more supportive than frequent sessions constrained by coverage rules.

There is no single correct path.

The goal is not to justify a choice. It is to understand it.

Equity, Cultural Fit, and Access

For many women, particularly women of color, insurance limitations create additional layers of difficulty.

Insurance networks often restrict access to culturally competent providers. Even when coverage exists, finding a therapist who both accepts a specific plan and understands cultural context, identity, or lived experience can be challenging.

Economic disparities can further increase out-of-pocket costs, making therapy feel inaccessible even when insurance is technically available.

In these situations, private-pay or out-of-network therapy is not a luxury. It is often a practical way to access care that feels safe, affirming, and effective.

Choosing private pay is frequently about access, not preference.

How This Applies to Working With Our Practice

We do not participate in insurance networks.

Our role is not to manage insurance or determine benefits on your behalf. Our role is to help you understand:

• What is the therapeutic process for our practice?

• What payment options do we accept, including credit cards and HSA/FSA accounts?

• Typical session rates usually start at $200 per session.

• How different approaches to paying for therapy may support your care?

Some people come to us after reviewing their insurance benefits. Others already know they want a private-pay or out-of-network option. Both are valid starting points.

What matters is that the decision feels informed and aligned with your values.

Next Step

If you would like help deciding whether using insurance, out-of-network benefits, or private pay is most suitable for you, click here to schedule a 30-minute paid virtual consultation. In this session, we discuss your current insurance coverage, payment options, and how these choices align with your therapy goals and personal needs.

We aim to provide clarity and guidance without pressure, helping you assess your fit with our practice, understand our therapeutic approaches, and determine appropriate next steps.

The next post in this series will explain how out-of-network reimbursement works, including what a superbill is and when it may be helpful.